HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1756 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Satendra Nath Rai, learned counsel for the informant. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.384 of 2025, under Sections 64(1), 131 BNS, P.S. Kotwali Colonelganj, District Gonda. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of informant used to talk to the applicant and on false pretext of marriage physical relation was formed on 15.9.2025. The age of daughter was disclosed as 17 years. In the light of the said allegations learned counsel for the applicant states that earlier also with regard to same victim FIR was lodged on 11.4.2018 under Section 354 IPC in which applicant was also made accused. Subsequently this FIR has been lodged. The tentative age of the victim is around 14 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the physical relation were alleged to have been formed on 15.9.2025 and FIR was registered on 20.9.2025 and also taking into consideration the earlier implication of various persons, prima facie, case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raja Babu Gupta, Vikas Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hassan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Hassan be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bond of Rs 5000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 20, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1756 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench