- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23284 RSA No. 386 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.386 OF 2022 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. MANJEGOWDA S/O NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT DODNAHALLI VILLAGE YASLURU HOBLI SAKALESHAPURA TALUK-573 137. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. B.C.VENKATESH, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. SOMAMMA W/O DEVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT DODNAHALLI VILLAGE YASLURU HOBLI SAKALESHAPURA TALUK-573 137. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.10.2020 PASSED IN R.A.NO.07/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGEAND JMFC, SAKALESHPUR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.06.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.93/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE I/c CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKALESHPUR. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23284 RSA No. 386 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has not paid the cost vide order dated 28.11.2023 and also not complied with the office objections, inspite of matter is listed sixth time for non-compliance of office objections. Even though cost was imposed and new counsel came on record, the said counsel has also not appeared and not complied with the office objections. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15