Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17422 (JHR)

SANJAY KUMAR ALIAS TIBAN BHUIYAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5983/2025 · 2025-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2025:JHHC:19845] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5983 of 2025 1. Sanjay Kumar @ Tiban Bhuiyan son of Rajkumar Bhuiyan aged about 23 years, 2. Arjun Baitha son of Hira Baitha aged about 26 years, Both resident of Village Kutmu PO & P.S. Barwadih, District Latehar. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rahul , Adv. For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari , Addl. PP. 02 / 17.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Barwadih P. S. case no. 08 of 2025 in G.R. no. 418 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. case no. 82 of 2025 instituted under Section 10, 238, 3 (5) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, committed murder of the Chandan Kumar and caused disappearance for the evidence of the murder. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false and the petitioners are not named in the FIR. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 17 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been in jail custody since 05.03.2025, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioners may be admitted on regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar in connection with Barwadih P. S. case no. 08 of 2025 in G.R. no. 418 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. case no. 82 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-