MOHD. SHADAB ANSARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME DEPTT.) LKO. AND ANOTHER
/10484/2025 · 2025-12-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174214 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174214 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10484 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Sri .Muzammil Asad, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- (i). to quash the charge sheet dated 13.6.2024 as well as summoning
order dated 22.7.2025 in case crime no.0090 of 2024, under sections 498- a, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act at Police Station Thakurganj, District Lucknow pending in the court of ACJM-V, District Lucknow (State vs. Mohd. Shadab Ansari and another) on the basis of compromise between the parties."
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Shadab Ansari And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home Deptt.) Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the
learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 15, 2025 Pks A482 No. 10484 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench