SMT. DIVYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF BAL VIKAS PUSHTHAHAR LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/13609/2025 · 2025-12-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13609 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to assign duties of the post of Anganwadi Worker in the Centre concerned.
3. It has been submitted that petitioner has been appointed on the said post vide order dated 01.05.2025 but is not being assigned any duties.
4. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions but do not indicate either income certificate of petitioner or her appointment as Anganwadi Worker to be cancelled till date.
5. In view thereof, petitioner is granted liberty to make a fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. District Programme Officer, Hardoi or any other competent authority. In case petitioner's appointment as Anganwadi Worker has not been cancelled, she shall be provided duties of the said post in pursuance of her selection and appointment dated 01.05.2025. Orders with regard to same shall be passed expeditiously within a period of three weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
6. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 1, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Kumar, Narsingh Bahadur Singh, Pushpa Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Divya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Bal Vikas Pushthahar Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench