VINOD KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1223/2025 · 2025-11-07
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174178 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174178 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1223 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.0105 of 2018 under sections 409, 419, 420 I.P.C., Police Station Barasagwar, district Unnao. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the complaint regarding sub-standard construction of toilets was duly enquired into by the department, and thereafter, the complaint was consigned to record. However, despite the said departmental findings, the Investigating Officer, after completion of investigation, has filed a charge sheet under Sections 419 and 409 IPC, and cognizance has been taken by the court. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history, the charge sheet has already been filed, and the applicant has cooperated during the course of investigation and undertakes to cooperate in the trial as well.
Learned counsel for the applicant co-accused Siyadhar has been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 16.10.2025 passed in Bail Application No.10120 of 2025. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. Considering the aforesaid aspects of the matter and upon perusal of the record, it is evident that the applicant has no criminal history. Taking into account the undertaking given on behalf of the applicant that he shall Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinod Kumar Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
cooperate in the trial, the fact that the charge sheet has already been filed, and also considering the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Musheer Alam vs. State of U.P. and another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116, and without entering into the merits of the case, this Court finds it appropriate to extend the benefit of protection to the applicant. In view of the above, it is provided that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within 10 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. On such surrender, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial and he will not influence the witnesses. The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. Any other condition which the trial court may deem fit and proper may also be imposed. In case of default, it would be open for the trial court to proceed in accordance with law. The application is allowed accordingly. November 7, 2025 Madhu D.R/P.S ABAIL No. 1223 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench