HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1663 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. (C.M. Application No. IA/2/2025) This is the application for condonation of delay in filing the substitution application. The reasons shown in the affidavits filed alongwith the application are satisfactory. Learned counsel for the private respondents and learned State counsel have no objection in allowing the application. Accordingly the application is allowed. The delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. (C.M. Application No.IA/3/2025) This is an application for substituting the legal heir of the applicant namely Mata Prasad after demise of applicant. Learned counsel for the private respondents and learned State counsel have no objection to the aforesaid application. Accordingly, the substitution application is allowed. Learned counsel for the applicant / appellant is permitted to make necessary amendment / incorporation in the memo of contempt application during course of the day. (Order on contempt application) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari, Piyush Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Prabhakar Tiwari Prem Nath .....Applicant(s) Shri Anand Prakash Rai Nayab Tehsildar Amaniganj Ayodhya .....Opposite Party(s) Learned counsel for the respondent has filed compliance affidavit enclosing therein the copy of order dated 16.06.2025 whereby the application under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been dismissed as abated as no application for substitution after demise of the applicant has been filed. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the substitution application alongwith recall application has already been filed before the respondent, which is pending, so liberty may be given to pursue the same and prayed that the present contempt application may be dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the applicant to pursue the case pending before the respondent. As prayed, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. The notice, if any, issued against the respondent is hereby discharged. It is always open for the applicant to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law. December 15, 2025 S. Kumar CAPL No. 1663 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench