ANIL KUMAR v. SECY. U.P. BASIC EDU. BOARD ALLAHABAD AND OTHERS
WRIA/24410/2017 · 2025-12-03
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174168 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174168 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 24410 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 3, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Verma, Anand Bhargava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajiv Singh Chauhan (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Secy. U.P. Basic Edu. Board Allahabad And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench