HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10645 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 2. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 20 of 2025, under sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 109(1), 324(2), 333, 117(2) of B.N.S, P.S. Haiderganj, District Ayodhya, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is an innocent person, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. He next submitted that the applicant was implicated in the present case on the basis of concocted facts as general allegations have been levelled against eight accused persons for causing injury to four injured persons and no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that three co-accused persons, namely, Dinesh Kumar Singh @ D.K.Singh, Anubhav Singh @ Vikram Sing and Lalu Pal @ Shiv Shankar, have been granted bail by this Court as well as by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc Bail Application Nos. 5229 of 2025, 4359 of 2025 and 7791 of 2025 vide orders dated 12.06.2025, 23.07.2025 and 08.10.2025, respectively. He seeks parity with the bail order of the said co-accused. 5. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hari Om Singh, Shubham Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raghvendra Singh @ Raghubeer Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) away after being released on bail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned A.G.A.has opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute that it is a case of parity. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the fact that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant in the alleged FIR ; the applicant is languishing in jail since 16.09.2025, he seeks parity with the bail orders of co-accused persons, namely, Dinesh Kumar Singh @ D.K.Singh, Anubhav Singh @ Vikram Sing and Lalu Pal @ Shiv Shankar and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail on the ground of parity. 8. Let the applicant Raghvendra Singh @ Raghubeer Singh, involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under BAIL No. 10645 of 2025 2 Section 229-A I.P.C. (now 269 BNS) (vi) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A I.P.C. (now 209 BNS). 9. The application is allowed on the ground of parity. November 10, 2025 DiVYa BAIL No. 10645 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench