[2025:RJ-JP:33166] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5815/2025 Imran S/o Imamuddin, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Aakliya Chouraha Barkat Ullah Colony, Police Station Pratap Nagar Sadar, District Jodhpur. (At Present In Sub Jail, Sambharlake). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9817/2025 Mohammd Naim @ Sonu @ Sanu S/o Mohammad Ismail, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kago Kagadi Bhil Basti Colony Nagori Gate, Police Station Nagori Gate, District Jodhpur. (At Present In Central Jail Jodhpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Mohd. Khan with Mr. Monu Kumar and Mr. Aditya Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP, Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 21/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.12/2025 registered at Police Station Sambhar, District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 331(3) and 305(a) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:33166] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5815/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioners are in custody since 23.01.2025 and 05.05.2025 respectively and the trial of the case may take considerable time and the charge-sheet against the petitioners have already been produced, therefore, these bail applications of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications and contended that the petitioner Imran was caught red-handed at the place of occurrence and on his instance, the stolen articles were recovered. The other petitioner Mohammd Naim was able to fled away from the place of occurrence, however, he was arrested thereafter on 05.05.2025 and both the petitioners have committed theft in the house of complainant. There are other 5 similar nature of cases pending against the accused petitioner Mohammad Naim and 11 cases pending against the petitioner Imran, in different police station, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since 23.01.2025 and 05.05.2025 respectively and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:33166] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5815/2025] 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Imran S/o Imamuddin and 2. Mohammd Naim @ Sonu @ Sanu S/o Mohammad Ismail, in connection with FIR No.12/2025 registered at Police Station Sambhar, District Jaipur Rural, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the applications against the petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/63-64