APHC010237582020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15656/2020 Between: 1. GOVADA SUBRAMANYAM, S/O VENKATESWAR RAO AGE. 36 YEARS R/O D.NO. 1-147, POLASANIPALLI, BHIMADOLE MANDAL, WEST GODAVRAI ANDHRA PRADESH - 534425 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. K SRI HARI RAO, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE. BHIMADOLE POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.. 3. GOVADA DURGA RAO, S/O VENKATESWAR RAO, R/O D.NO. 1-146, POLASANIPALLI, BHIMADOLE MANDAL, WEST GODAVRAI ANDHRA PRADESH - 534425 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15656 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering with civil dispute of the petitioner and thereby harassing the petitioner by summoning him to police station and making him to stand from 9am to 5pm, every day at the instance of the 3rd respondent yielding to the pressures brought out by him through his political identities, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of principles of natural justice and established judicial precedents, and pass….” 2. Heard Sri P.Aditya Harsha Vardhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 11.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.15656 of 2020 Dated.11.09.2025 UPS 179