NIRMALA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/10871/2025 · 2025-11-11
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174129 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174129 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10871 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner(s) to approach appropriate forum/authority for redressal of her grievance in accordance with law.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. November 11, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharvan Kumar Pandey, Neelam Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Nirmala .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench