VINDESHWARI PRASAD AND ANOTHER v. CHIEF REVENUE OFFICER, GONDA AND OTHERS
A227/6367/2025 · 2025-10-30
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6367 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Anoop Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Chief Revenue Officer, Disrict - Gonda, to decide Case No. 932 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. D 20228300000932) - Vindeshwari and Others Vs. Ram Prakash and Others, U/S 38(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Chief Revenue Officer, Disrict - Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Chief Revenue Officer, Disrict - Gonda, is directed to decide Case No. 932 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. D 20228300000932) - Vindeshwari and Others Vs. Ram Prakash and Others, U/S 38(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
October 30, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Vindeshwari Prasad And Another .....Petitioner(s) Chief Revenue Officer, Gonda And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench