Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174100 (ALL)

ANARA DEVI @ ANARKALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/10589/2025 · 2025-10-31

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10589 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.361 of 2025 under Sections 85, 103(1) of BNS, P.S.- Kotwali Dehat, District- Sultanpur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married to the son of the applicant. Subsequently, on account of non- payment of dowry, she was killed by the entire matrimonial family. The cause of death as per the post-mortem report is ante-mortem throttling. However, apart from the ligature mark, no other injury was observed, even the hyoid bone was not fractured. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the post-mortem report, and there being nothing specific against the applicant who is the mother- in-law of the deceased, is in custody since 27.08.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Anara Devi @ Anarkali be released on bail in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajendra Pratap Singh, Sushilendra Kumar Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anara Devi @ Anarkali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. . October 31, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 10589 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench