Sreema Multi-Purpose Co-Operative Society Ltd. v. The State of Tripura and 5 Others
WP(C)/669/2025 · 2025-12-03
T Amarnath Goud
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1741 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1741 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) NO.669 OF 2025
Sreemaa Multi-Purpose Co-Operative Society Ltd, A multipurpose Co-operative society registered under Tripura Co- Operative Society Act 1974. having it's office at Central road, Dharmanagar, District North Tripura represented by its Manager Biswajit Nath, S/o-Prafulla Nath (aged about 49 years)resident of Central road Dharmanagar,P.o- Dharmanagar- 799 250, P.S-Dharmanagar, District- North Tripura. ……..Petitioner(s)
1. The State of Tripura, Represented by the Secretary Public Works Department (DWS) Government of Tripura, Civil Secretariat P.O- Kunjaban - 799006, P.S-New Capital Complex, District West Tripura. 2. The Chief Engineer, Public Works department (DWS) Government of Tripura, Civil Secretariat, P.O-Kunjaban 799006,P.S- New Capital Complex, District-West Tripura
3. The Executive Engineer, DWS Division, Ambassa, Jawharnagar, District-Dhalai Tripura. 4. The Executive Engineer(P), DWS circle, Ambassa, Jawharnagar, District-Dhalai Tripura. 5. The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Departments, DWS Circle, Ambassa, District-Dhalai Tripura. 6. The Sr. Divisional Accounts Officer, DWS, Division, Ambassa, Jawarhanagar, District- Dhalai, Tripura. ………Respondents
Present: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Biplab Debnath, Advocate. Ms. M. Debbarma, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharya, G.A.
Mr. D. Sharma, Addl. G.A.
HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD Order 03.12.2025
1. This present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-
“1. Admit to the writ petition;
ii. Call for the relevant record from the custody of the respondents;
iii. Issue RULE calling upon the respondents to show course why a writ of Mandamus and/or in the nature shall not be issued directing the respondent to refund the admitted total security deposit Rs.4,56,417/- Rs. Four Lakh Fifty Six thousand four hundred seventeen) and the admitted of dues of 1 RA bill Rs. 61,038 including admitted dues final bill amounting to Rs.36,97,3349/-. In total admitted final bill amounting to Rs. 42,14,804/- (Rs. Forty Two Lakh Fourteen thousand Eight Hundred Four)to the petitioner for the satisfactory completion of work namely "Collection, Transportation and supplying of pea gravels articles of approved quality of size range over 2.00mm to 4.75mm.best quality of Durgapur, west Bengal to the Departmental store yard at Ambassador surface water treatment plant, Kulai during the year 2020-2021(Group-1)."
iv. After hearing the parties being pleased to make rules issuing direction to the respondents;
AND Pass such other or orders, further order and direction/directions as deem fit and proper for the interest of justice.”
2.
Heard Mr. B. Debnath, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that on completion of the works, the respondents are not paying the bills. 4. It is seen from the record that the petitioner vide a demand letter dated 02.09.2025 requested the respondent No.3 to release the security deposit money and balance amount of his bill. But till date, the
same is pending before the respondents without any consideration or reply. Hence this present writ petition. 5. Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharyya, learned G.A., represents that it a Central Government Scheme and unless the funds are released to State by the Central Government, the amounts cannot be released and the State is awaiting for funds. He further contended that the Union of India has not been party in this present writ petition. He prayed to dismiss this present writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to consider the demand letter dated 02.09.2025 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order and after consideration, communicate their decision/reply to the petitioner herein. This writ petition is disposed of without making any opinion on merits. 7. With the above observation and direction, this present writ petition stands disposed of. As a sequel, stay if any stands vacated. Pending application(s), if any also stands closed. DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD, J
Suhanjit SABYASACHI GHOSH Digitally signed by SABYASACHI GHOSH Date: 2025.12.04 16:12:18 +05'30'