Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2025 DAILYLAW 1741 (PNJ)
RAJPAL @ RAAJPAAL v. STATE OF HARYANA
CRM-M/70159/2025 · 2026-02-27
Manisha Batra
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1741 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1741 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-70159-2025 and CRM-M-69746-2025 -1-
!"#$%&#'()($*+",#-./!.01 + 234 44
!
"
# $$$ 415 36+ %
&
"
&
'(
"
") '(! *
25 13.01.2025 Gharaunda, District Karnal 3(5), 304, 238(B) and 309(4) of +! ,-,. /
0+!12 PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.02.27 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-70159-2025 and CRM-M-69746-2025 -2-
, %
'("
&
" & &
"
""
3!
4 + " " 4 5 " "" 3 67.-7,-,8 4 5 ,8 ---9) " " & & " " " " " & " & " 3 & 3" : . '( " * & ; + / 4))<=>?<),-,82 / 4))>-78=),-,82" 6 % 7---9) 3 6 ,.@/+2 +!" ( " ? ( & & & ( "& " ) & + 4 5 " PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.02.27 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-70159-2025 and CRM-M-69746-2025 -3- % % A % " 3 &
Therefore, it is stressed that the petitioners deserve to be released on bail. 5. Reply and custody certificates have been filed by respondent- State. Learned State counsel has argued that there are serious and specific allegations against the petitioners. Recovery of the snatched articles were effected from them. %
&
: &
&Therefore, it is stressed that the petitions do not deserve to be allowed. 6.
% 4 & > % ,8->,-,8 ( % & % & " & " & 3 & " ,8->,-,8 % ( " ) & ) %3 & 4 & " " & & PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.02.27 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-70159-2025 and CRM-M-69746-2025 -4- & & & & " 4 94 B 9 * % & & 4 C " & 4 & 4 !4 & & /2
4 & & /2 3 & 4 % " " @ ( " & & & : = & 7- & 74 8 ", #-./!.01 PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.02.27 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document