SUSHILA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CIVIL SECTT. DEPTT. OF FINANCE LKO AND OTHERS
WRIC/4117/2025 · 2025-11-13
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174091 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174091 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 4117 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following main prayers:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to Consider and take a appropriate decision by passing a reasoned order on the claim of the petitioner under the government order dated 09.06.2021 within a stipulated time period, In the Interest of Justice.
ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider and take a decision on application dated 24.03.2025 regarding the claim of the petitioner on merit as per guideline and eligibility given in the G.O. dated 09.06.2021 as contained as Annexure no. 5 to this writ petition in the interest of Justice."
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has handed over the copy of the order in the instant matter with regard to the rejection of the claim of the petitioner to counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. It appears that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected on the basis that the deceased had died due to poisoning because of an insect bite and not because of a snake bite.
5. The rejection order has been handed over to the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, with this development this writ petition has Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajjan Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sushila .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Deptt. Of Finance Lko And Others .....Respondent(s)
become infructuous and accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
5. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file a fresh writ petition with regard to the new cause of action that is reason for rejection of the claim petition of the petitioner. November 13, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- WRIC No. 4117 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench