HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7678 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Nadeem Murtaza, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Prashant Tiwari, learned Counsel for the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.93 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 302, 506, 34 IPC, Police Station Saadatganj, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on account of there being disagreement of the marriage, all the accused named in the FIR had attacked the girl as well as the son of the informant, which subsequently resulted into his death. 4. In the light of the said allegations, the Counsel for the applicant argues that one of the co-accused, namely, Mohd. Usmaan has been enlarged on bail vide orders annexed as Annexure-10 of the bail application mainly on the ground that he was not opposed the marriage. It is also argued by the Counsel for the applicant that two of the co-accused Mohd. Suleman and Mohd. Shanu have been denied the benefit of bail by this Court vide order dated 12.05.2022. It is also argued that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is in custody since 06.04.2020. It is also stated that all the witnesses have now been examined. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Piyush Shrivastava, Adam Sultan, Anand Kanaujia, Nadeem Murtaza Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Prashant Tiwari, Sayed Weqar Husain Mohd. Ranu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P., Thru. The Secy. Of Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 6. Considering the fact that the applicant, who has no criminal history, has suffered pretrial detention of more than 5 years and all the fact witnesses have been examined and there is nothing on record to demonstrate that the applicant if enlarged on bail, would in any way adversely affect the trial, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Mohd. Ranu be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 6, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 7678 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench