HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1714 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the petitioner to file surety bond in each and every nine cases and accept only two sureties in lieu of both the nine cases. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit surety in each of case in which he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in all cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- 1) Case Crime No. 178 of 2025, under Sections 305(A), 317(2), 331 (4), 317(4), BNS PS Kotwali Dehat, District Balrampur. 2) Case Crime No. 220 of 2025, under Sections 305(A), 331(4), 317 (2), 317(4) BNS PS Kotwali Dehat, District Balrampur. 3) Case Crime No. 78 of 2025, under Sections 305(A), 331(4), 317(2), 317(4) BNS PS Pachpedwa, District Balrampur. 4) Case Crime No. 53 of 2025, under Sections 305(A), 331(4), 317 (2), 317(4) BNS PS Gaidas Bujurg, District Balrampur. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kr. Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anil .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 5) Case Crime No. 51 of 2025, under Sections 305(A), 331(4), 317(2) BNS PS Kotwali Utraula, District Balrampur. 6) Case Crime No. 58 of 2025, under Sections 305(A), 331(4), 317 (2) BNS PS Shridattganj, District Balrampur. 7) Case Crime No. 95 of 2025, under Sections 305(A), 331(4), 317(2) BNS PS Rehra Bazar, District Balrampur. 8) Case Crime No. 69 of 2025, under Sections 305(A), 331(4), 317(2) BNS PS Shridattganj District Balrampur. 9) Case Crime No. 101 of 2025, under Sections 305(A), 331(4), 317 (4), BNS PS Tulsipur, District Balrampur. 4. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail, the applicant is still in jail and the applicant being poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. November 11, 2025 P.S NA528 No. 1714 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench