NADEEM KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME AFFAIRS LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
BAIL/1849/2025 · 2025-11-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174072 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174072 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1849 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Shri Mohd Yasin and Shri Vaibhav Srivastava, learned counsels for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 313 of 2024 under sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) BNS, Sections 5(L)/6 POCSO Act and Sections 3(2)VA of SC/ST Act, P.S. Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant was enticed by some unknown persons. Subsequently in her statement under Section 183 BNSS the victim did not support the prosecution story. The tentative age of the victim is around 17 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the statement of the victim, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 13.11.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Nadeem Khan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd.Yasin, Vaibhav Srivastava, Vishnu Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sanjay Kumar Singh Nadeem Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Affairs Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 11, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 1849 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench