Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174064 (ALL)

ASGAR ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/11418/2025 · 2025-11-25

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11418 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3 has been accepted by the Office of the Chief Standing Counsel. 2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding thereby commanding and directing the opposite party no.3 to stop the illegal construction work made by the opposite party no.4 to 9 upon the land in question bearing Gata No.578, situated in Tardeeh @ Tarauli, Tehsil-Milkipur, District-Ayodhya, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding thereby commanding and directing the private opposite party no.4 to 9 to not made further construction and maintain status-quo, in the interest of justice. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding thereby commanding and directing the opposite party no.2 to consider and decide the representation dated 07.11.2025 with a speaking and reasoned order, as contained in Annexure No.6 to this writ petition." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ranjeet Pal, Kaushal Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Asgar Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. Considering the aforesaid reliefs, a specific query was put to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether he has approached the competent Court to which he has answered in negative. However, he has pointed out that the petitioner has made a representation to the Sub- Divisional Magistrate concerned, a copy of which has been placed on record as Annexure No.6. 4. Be that as it may, since it is a case of private dispute, no mandamus can be issued as prayed leaving it open for the petitioner to take recourse as may be available to him in law. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the petition stands dismissed. November 25, 2025 Rakesh/- WRIC No. 11418 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench