AJAD KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
BAIL/10444/2025 · 2025-10-31
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174059 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174059 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10444 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Sheel Nidhi Shukla, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.110 of 2025, under Section 85, 80(2) BNS & Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Salon, District Raebareli.
3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that sister of the informant was married to the applicant and subsequently, the entire matrimonial family had killed her. Cause of death as per the postmortem report is ante mortem hanging. Co-accused have been enlarged on bail. Applicant is husband of the deceased.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the postmortem report and there being nothing on record to demonstrate that soon before her death the victim was harassed mentally or physically at the instance of the applicant in relation to demand of dowry, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ajad Kumar Verma be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ajad Kumar Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 31, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 10444 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench