GIRISH CHANDRA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/13070/2025 · 2025-11-12
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174055 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174055 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13070 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to refund the amount of Rs.4,83,600/- along with interest, which allegedly has been deducted from retiral benefits of petitioner.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that inadvertently the recovery order could not be challenged. He therefore seeks liberty to file afresh.
4. Considering aforesaid submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh. November 12, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shambhunath Mishra, Anand Babu Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Girish Chandra Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench