Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174052 (ALL)

HUKUM SINGH YADAV @ BHOLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

NABAIL/1614/2025 · 2025-10-30

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1614 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.203 of 2025, under Sections 85, 108, 351(2) of BNS, Police Station Kothi, District Barabanki. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that on similar allegations the co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 15.10.2025 in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482, B.N.S.S., and nothing specific and differential has been stated against the applicant, who is husband. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering and adopting the reasoning contained in para-3 and the fact that no specific allegation has been levelled against the applicant, the applicant, who is the husband and has no criminal history, I am of the view that the applicant is also entitled for the benefit of anticipatory bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Hukum Singh Yadav alias Bhola be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avadhesh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hukum Singh Yadav @ Bhola .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 30, 2025 A.Nigam NABAIL No. 1614 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench