Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17405 (GAU)

PRAFULLA BORAH v. UNION OF INDIA and 2 ORS.

WP(C)/7888/2016 · 2025-01-27

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010176482016 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7888/2016 PRAFULLA BORAH S/O SRI KUMUD BORAH, R/O HOLESWAR, P.O. HOLESWAR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN-784104 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA and 2 ORS. REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATUARL GAS, NEW DELHI-1 2:THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR INDIA OIL CORPORATION LTD. 3079/3 SADIQUE NAGAR J.B. TITO MARG NEW DELHI-49 3:THE CHIEF AREA MANAGER INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. INTEGRATED AREA OFFICE GUWAHATI DR. B.K. KAKATI ROAD KACHARI BASTI ULUBARI GHY- Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.P SAHARIA, MR.P MAHANTA Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., C.G.C.,MR.C. K. S. BARUAH (R-1),MR.M K CHOUDHURY,SC, O I L Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 28-01-2025 Ms. B. Khaklari, learned counsel appearing for Mr. P. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and moreover, the original writ petitioner has expired during the pendency of the writ petition. Mr. P. Bharadwaj, learned counsel for the respondent IOCL Authorities is present and has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous and the original writ petitioner has expired, the writ petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant