HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11976 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Sri Mukesh Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that certain defects have crept in the petition as such he does not want to press the petition and prays for liberty to file a fresh petition. Sri Devendra Mohan Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. December 15, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Dayal, Mukesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Shri Sadhguru Lalmani Shah Chela Sadhguru Dhani Shah Thru. P.O.A. Holder Pankaj Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench