Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174046 (ALL)

SMT. RAMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTT. MAGISTRATE LAKHIMPUR KHERI AND 7 OTHERS

/11241/2025 · 2025-11-19

Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11241 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Upon reconsideration, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is also of the view that she should move a proper application under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to move a fresh application in accordance with law. In case such an application is moved within a period of one week from date, the authority concerned is directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all other relevant persons, and thereafter, pass a reasoned order in accordance with law in an expeditious manner, preferably within a further period of two months. November 19, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar, Bajranj Bali Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Smt. Rama .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Lakhimpur Kheri And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench