1 2025:CGHC:36642 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 580 of 2022 United India Insurance Company Limited, Through- Divisional Manager, R/o. Tara Complex, G.E. Road, Power House, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) Through Authorized Signatory, Manager T.P. Hub United India Insurance Company Limited, T.P. Hub/divisional Office, LIC Building, Magharpara Chowk, Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - Shrikant Dashore, S/o. Umakant Dashore, Aged About 37 Years, R/o. Ward No. 59, House No. 519, In Front Of Mandal Kirana Stores, Hari Nagar, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) (Claimant) 2 - Rahul Tandi, S/o. Ranjit Tandi, Aged About 19 Years, R/o. Near Navyuvak Manch, Near Jaikaran Hotel Titurdih, Durg, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) (Driver) 3 - Mukesh Singh Thakur, S/o. Tahalu Singh Thakur, Aged About 37 Years, R/o. Ward No. 59, Near Chandi Kirana Stores, Hari Nagar, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) (Owner). ... Respondents ASHOK SAHU Digitally signed by ASHOK SAHU Date: 2025.07.29 16:53:04 +0530 2 For Appellant : Mr. B.N.Nande, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. T.R.Patel, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate (Single Bench) Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Judgment on Board 28/07/2025 1. The appellant/insurance company has preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act calling in question the legality, validity and correctness of the impugned award dated 29.01.2022 passed by the learned Sixth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Durg in Claim Case No.486/2019 whereby an amount of compensation of Rs.99,115/- has been awarded to the claimant in respect of the injuries sustained by him along- with interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of filing of claim application. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant/insurance company would submit that the amount of compensation awarded to the claimant is at higher side, therefore, the appeal deserves to be allowed. 3 3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1/claimant would support the impugned award and submit that the learned Claims Tribunal has rightly awarded the compensation to the claimant, therefore, the appeal deserves to be dismissed. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, considered their rival submissions made herein-above and went through the records with utmost circumspection. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, I do not find any illegality in the impugned award as the amount awarded under different heads as discussed in para 33 of the impugned award is just and proper. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in this appeal, the same deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Ashok Judge