RINKU OJHA ALIAS PRADEEP OJHA v. STATE OF U.P THRU.SECY. DEPTT. HOME AFFAIRS SECTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/5908/2025 · 2025-11-06
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174022 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174022 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5908 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri K.P. Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.28 of 2024, under Section 363, 366, 376 IPC & Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Antoo, District Pratapgarh.
3. In terms of the FIR, a missing person report was lodged alleging that daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently, in the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the victim did not support the prosecution. Criminal antecedents of the applicant have been duly explained and the applicant is on bail in all the cases.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and the fact that the victim is aged about 17 years, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Rinku Ojha @ Pradeep Ojha be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Himanshu Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Kalika Prasad Pandey Rinku Ojha Alias Pradeep Ojha .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru.Secy. Deptt. Home Affairs Sectt. Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 6, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 5908 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench