- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:593 WP No. 4903 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 4903 OF 2021 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN: SRI. B.S.RAFIULLA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O B.ASHUKUR SAB, ADMINISTRATOR, JAMATHAHLE ISLAM CHICKBALLAPUR, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT R/AT NO.218, BURHAN MANZIL, NEW POST OFFICE ROAD, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BILALAHMED TURKI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF, NO.6 CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE-560 052. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. S.R.ANURADHA., SMT. SWATHI ASHOK., ADVOCATES) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:593 WP No. 4903 of 2021 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. The captioned Writ Petition is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2021 i.e., on 05.03.2021 and the office has raised certain objections on 08.03.2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. It's almost four years. So far, office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 43