PANKAJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. BASIC EDU. LUCKNOW AND ORS.
WRIA/1032/2020 · 2025-12-10
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1032 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhat Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Pankaj Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Basic Edu. Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench