C/M SARDAR MOHAR SINGH MEMORIAL GIRLS DEGREE COLLEGE THRU.ITS MANAGER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. HIGHER EDUCATION LKO. AND 14 OTHERS
/6069/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174010 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174010 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 6069 of 2025 Along with :
1. Writ - C No. 6232 of 2025: C/M Sardar Mohar Singh Memorial Girls Degree College,Thru. its Manager Versus State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Higher Education Lko. and 12 others Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Short counter affidavit filed on behalf of Opposite Party No. 6 is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Mayankar Singh, learned counsel assisted by Shri S.P. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Shri Hemant Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Parties No. 11 & 12. 3. In compliance of this Court's order dated 18.11.2025, District Magistrate, Gonda is present before this Court in person. 4. After hearing the parties counsels, it transpires that as of now, the ingress and egress of the students of Sardar Mohar Singh Memorial Girls Degree College is not possible. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neeraj Kumar Rai, Mayankar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Arti Ganguly, Hemant Kumar Mishra C/M Sardar Mohar Singh Memorial Girls Degree College Thru.Its Manager .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Higher Education Lko. And 14 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid situation, we hereby direct that the district administration shall ensure the ingress and egress of students on the path which is present on Gata No. 486(क). 6. We also make it clear that our direction issued in this order shall not be treated as any kind of creation of title over Gata No. 486(क), in favour of the college or anybody else, and the same shall be subject to final outcome of the matters pending before different courts. 7. We also provide that the petitioners shall not raise any construction, either permanent or temporary, over the land of Gata No. 486(क). 8. The aforesaid arrangement is tentative in nature and has been made by us only keeping in view the interest of students. 9. We further direct the District Magistrate, Gonda to enquire from Ms. Pushpa, who is the co-shareholder of abadi land in Gata No. 484 and try to arrange a path through the land belonging to Ms. Pushpa by removal of the wall that has been constructed in the month of June, 2025.
The District Magistrate shall try and ensure that a solution may be reached between Ms. Pushpa and the petitioner college herein, so that the ingress and egress of the students that was prevailing before June, 2025 may continue. 10. In the event, a solution is reached between Ms. Pushpa and the petitioner-college, and the students are allowed ingress and egress from that area, as was prevalent earlier, the present arrangement provided by us, shall cease. 11. We express our appreciation to the District Magistrate, Gonda, who was present in Court today and has clarified the situation. 12. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. November 20, 2025 Lokesh Kumar WRIC No. 6069 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench