Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17401 (RAJ)

PRABHATI LAL S/O ROOPNARAYAN v. RAMESH CHANDRA MEENA S/O SHRI ROOPNARAYAN MEENA

CR/107/2019 · 2025-03-06

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10210] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 107/2019 1. Prabhati Lal S/o Roopnarayan, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Dungarpur Tehsil- Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Roop @ Roopnarayan S/o Dola @ Daulat, R/o Village Dungarpur Tehsil- Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 3. Sona Devi W/o Rajendra Meena, R/o Village Shri Ramchandrapura, R/o (Naya Gaon) Tehsil- Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa. 4. Saru W/o Motilal, R/o Village Shri Ramchandrapura, R/o (Naya Gaon) Tehsil- Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa. 5. Suman Kumar D/o Roopnarayan, R/o Village Dungarpur Tehsil- Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Ramesh Chandra Meena S/o Shri Roopnarayan Meena, By Caste Meena, R/o Village Dungarpura Tehsil- Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa At Present Residing At Plot No. 14, Durgesh Nagar, Near Chak Getor Mahima Group, Pratap Nagar Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Rambhajan S/o Shri Roopnarayan Meena, R/o Village Dungarpura Tehsil- Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa At Present Residing At House Of Badrinarayan Meena, Panchwati Colony, Chak Getor Pratapnagar, Sanganer Jaipur Rajasthan. 3. Foranti W/o Tundaram Meena,R/o Village Singhpura, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara District Dausa, Rajasthan. 4. Geeta W/o Murarilal Meena, R/o (New Village) Singhpura, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara District Dausa, Rajasthan. 5. Authorized Officer (Land Acquisition) And Sub Divisional Officer, Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : None [2025:RJ-JP:10210] (2 of 2) [CR-107/2019] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/03/2025 1. None present for petitioner despite taking up the matter in second round. 2. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the revision petition. 3. The revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /87