Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174001 (ALL)

MADHYANCHAL VIDUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. THRU. M.D. and ANR. v. ANWAR ALI and ANR.

WRIC/25307/2019 · 2025-11-11

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 25307 of 2019 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Ms. Sadhvi appearing under the authority of Sri Amarjeet Singh Rakhra learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount which was required to be paid in pursuance of the impugned order had been paid and the department does not have any further grievance. In view of the aforesaid statement, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Consigned to record. November 11, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amarjeet Singh Rakhra Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Madhyanchal Vidut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Thru. M.D. And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) Anwar Ali And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench