Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17400 (GAU)

SMTI MINA KARMAKAR v. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

I.A.(Civil)/2600/2025 · 2025-08-19

Yarenjungla Longkumer

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010176642025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2600/2025 SMTI MINA KARMAKAR WIFE OF LATE KRISNA KANTA KARMAKAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE 10 NO BEESAKOPIE, PO ROOPAI SIDING, PS DOOMDOMA, DISTRICT TINSUKIA, PIN 786153 2: SUNANDA KARMAKAR D/O LATE KRISHNA KANTA KARMAKAR VILL.- 10 NO BEESAKOPIE P.O.- RUPAI SIDING P.S.- DOOMDOOMA DIST.- TINSUKIA (ASSAM) PIN- 786153. 3: KAPIL CHANDRA KARMAKAR S/O LATE KRISHNA KANTA KARMAKAR VILL.- 10 NO BEESAKOPIE P.O.- RUPAI SIDING P.S.- DOOMDOOMA DIST.- TINSUKIA (ASSAM) PIN- 786153. 4: SURAJIT KARMAKAR S/O LATE KRISHNA KANTA KARMAKAR VILL.- 10 NO BEESAKOPIE P.O.- RUPAI SIDING P.S.- DOOMDOOMA DIST.- TINSUKIA (ASSAM) PIN- 786153. (BEING MINOR REP. BY HIS LEGAL GUARDIAN MOTHER THAT IS Page No.# 2/4 RESPONDENT NO. 1). 5: KABITA KALITA KARMAKAR SECOND WIFE OF LT KRISHNA KANTA KARMAKAR VILL.- 10 NO BEESAKOPIE P.O.- RUPAI SIDING P.S.- DOOMDOOMA DIST.- TINSUKIA (ASSAM) PIN- 786153 VERSUS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT STAR CITY COMPLEX, 5TH FLOOR, LACHIT NAGAR, NEAR HANUMAN MANIDR, GS ROAD, GUWAHATI 7, ASSAM 2:AMAN ALI S/O UMED ALI R/O VILL- DEASI NADIYA GAON P.O.-GHUMTIBILL VIA CHAPAKHOWA P.S.-SADIYA DIST- TINSUKIA (ASSAM) PIN-786155 3:JABED AHMED S/O AINUL AHMED R/O KAKOJAN NO. 4 P.O.-KAKOJAN P.S.-DOOMDOOMA SUB DIVISION SADIYA DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-78510 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. C SARMAH, MS B DUTTA,S R GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R GOSWAMI, Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER Date : 20.08.2025 1. Heard Mr. S.R Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicant No. 1, 2 & 4. 2. This is an application praying for allowing the applicant/claimant to withdraw an amount of Rs. 18,24,063/- which was deposited on 20.06.2024 by the appellant/insurer in compliance of the order dated 29.05.2024 passed in I.A. 1537/2024 arising out of M.A.C Appeal No. 228/2024. 3. Mr. R Goswami, learned counsel for respondent No. 1, 2 & 4 submits that the connected M.A.C Appeal No. 228/2024 has been admitted. 4. As per this Court’s order dated 29.05.2024, the impugned judgment and award dated 29.05.2024 has been stayed subject to deposit of 25% of the awarded amount i.e. Rs. 18,24,063/- before the Registry of this Court and the same has been deposited on 20.06.2024. 5. Mr. S.R Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicants/claimants No. 1, 2 & 4 are facing financial hardship and they have incurred huge expenditure during the course of the deceased father/husband treatment and accordingly, prays that the said deposited amount may be allowed to be withdrawn by the applicants/claimants No. 1, 2 & 4. 6. In view of the above observations and facts & circumstances, this Court directs that the deposited amount of Rs. 18,24,063/- deposited on 20.06.2024 may be may be allowed to be withdrawn by the applicants/claimants No. 1, 2 & 4 subject to the proper verification and identification. 7. In terms of the above observations, this Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. Page No.# 4/4 JUDGE Comparing Assistant