Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174 (UTT)

HARISH AHUJA v. MANISH DHIMAN

SPLA/63/2025 · 2026-03-17

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

]SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS SPLA No.63 of 2025 Harish Ahuja Vs. Manish Dhiman With CRLA No.152 of 2025 Naresh Sachdeva Vs. Vipin Arora Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the Respondent. 3. Present leave to appeal is filed by appellant under Section 419(4) of B.N.S.S. against the impugned judgment and order dated 16.01.2025 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar, District Haridwar in Complaint Case No.2301 of 2024 Harish Ahuja Vs. Manish Dhiman under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, P.S. Jwalapur, District Haridwar. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant on the leave to appeal submits that learned trial court mis- interpreted the presumption clause so aligned with the decision of the alleged offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. 5. The ground found to be sufficient at this juncture. Special leave to appeal is granted. 6. Admit. 7. The lower court record has been received and paper book has been prepared. 8. Learned counsel for the respondent requests that paper book be furnished to him; it be furnished to the concerned parties, as per Rules. 9. Let the objection be filed by the respondent within two weeks. 10. List this matter for final hearing on 16.04.2026. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 17.03.2026 Arti