Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173992 (ALL)

VIJAY MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/10283/2025 · 2025-12-04

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10283 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Sachin Pandey, learned counsel, who has filed power on behalf of opposite party nos.2 and 3, which is taken on record. 2. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Session Case No.1493 of 2023, State Vs. Vijay Mourya, arising out of Case Crime No.142 of 2023, under Sections 363 and 376 IPC, Section ¾ POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda and the order dated 01.11.2023 passed by the Additional Sessions and Special Magistrate, POCSO Act, Gonda. 3. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise and the original compromise deed dated 10.11.2025 has been annexed as Annexure-7 to the application, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties before the court concerned. 5. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of with a direction to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aviral Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vijay Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) both the parties to appear before the court concerned on 12.12.2025 and file their comprise application. If such compromise application is filed, the court concerned shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within six weeks from that date. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court making compromise to be part of the record and a report to that effect shall also be send to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not. The court concerned will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise. It will also be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 7 Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the counsel for the applicant(s) after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. December 4, 2025 Rao/- A482 No. 10283 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench