SMT. MAMTA SAINI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME SECTT. LKO AND ANOTHER
/161/2024 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173989 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173989 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 161 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
2. The present bail cancellation has been filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused on 19.12.2023.
3. The averment is that after being enlarged on bail, threats were issued, for which, FIR No.306 of 2024, under Sections 351(2) of BNS was lodged.
4. Considering the bald nature of allegations and there is nothing stated before the trial court for providing any protection, the bail cancellation application is rejected. November 26, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar, Gulam Mustafa, Smt. Ranjana Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Anurag Trivedi, Puneet Saxena (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Smt. Mamta Saini .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench