Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173987 (ALL)

HARSHIT SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/10095/2025 · 2025-11-06

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10095 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Learned A.G.A. has raised preliminary objection stating that this petition has been filed with the misconceived prayer which cannot be granted by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed. 4. Dismissed accordingly. 5. The dismissal of the writ petition will not come in the way of the investigation. The petitioner may avail the appropriate remedy, if required. November 6, 2025 kanhaiya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Samrat Gupta, Ravindra Pratap Trivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Harshit Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench