TAJ MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND OTHERS
CRLP/9663/2024 · 2025-11-11
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173984 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173984 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9663 of 2024
And CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10056 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. ..
1. Case called out.
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press these petitions nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made whereas learned A.G.A for the State is present. 3.These two petitions have been filed challenging the F.I.R dated 29.11.2024 vide Case Crime No.0506 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 324(2), 333, 115(2), 351(3), 109 B.N.S IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932, Police Station Tarabganj, District Gonda. 4.Learned A.G.A. on the basis of telephonic instructions submits that the charge-sheet dated 11.02.2025 has been filed in the Court, therefore, these Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalji Yadav, Vishnu Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalji Yadav, Abhijeet Bharti Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ajay Shukla Taj Mohammad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And Others .....Respondent(s) Sahid Ali And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
petitions have lost their efficacy.
5. Dismissed accordingly. November 11, 2025 Shahnaz CRLP No. 9663 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench