Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17397 (UTT)

JITENDRA PATHAK v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/2395/2024 · 2025-12-15

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:11177 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PSS/ 2 3 9 5 / 2 0 2 4 w it h W PSS/ 7 2 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioners in WPSS No. 2395 of 2024. 2. Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioners in WPSS No. 72 of 2025. 3. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 4. Ms. Shabana, Advocate, holding brief of Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for respondent nos. 8 to 11 in WPSS No. 2395 of 2024. 5. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. 6. Petitioners are members of Provincial Armed Constabulary, to which they were appointed in 2003 as Platoon Commander. They have raised a 2025:UHC:11177 seniority dispute in this writ petition. 7. Since petitioners have remedy before Tribunal established under U.P. Public Service (Tribunals) Act, 1976, therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petitions. 8. The writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Tribunal. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 15.12.2025 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f 487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A10381 9DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21C E5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.12.16 10:01:02 +05'30'