DINESH CHANDRA SHRIVASTAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ LKO. U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/3271/2025 · 2025-10-29
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3271 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 14th February, 2025 directing recovery from petitioner's pensionary benefits with regard to alleged excess payment of leave encashment of petitioner. The order clearly indicates that excess payment has been indicated in pursuance of refixation of pay scale of petitioner. Aforesaid refixation of pay scale was under challenged in Writ A No. 2204 of 2025 which has been allowed today. In view thereof, the order impugned in the present petition being consequential thereto, the impugned order dated 14th February, 2025 is also quashed by issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorarri. Refund of recovery already initiated from pension of petitioner shall be made within a period of six weeks and shall be subject to outcome of the decision by the authorities concerned as directed in writ No. 2204 of 2025. The petition stands allowed. October 29, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Gautam, Ritu Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Dinesh Chandra Shrivastav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench