DISHAAN AND 2 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9266/2025 · 2025-11-11
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173954 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173954 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9266 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard. 2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"To quash the impugned charge sheet dated 02.05.2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 67/2024, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., pertaining to Police Station- Saadatganj, District- Lucknow as well as the impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 11.12.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, First Class/A.T.S., Lucknow in Criminal Case No. 118602/2024, [Filing No. W/S-113801/2024 "State Vs. Dishan & Others" including the entire consequential proceedings thereof, in terms of compromise dated 07.02.2025 as contained in Annexure No.1&2 to this application."
3. It is informed that vide order dated 14.02.2025, a direction was given to the trial court to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned trial court had verified the contents of compromise. 4. It is also informed that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the trial court vide report/order dated 24.03.2025. 5. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the trial court. 6. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Imran Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dishaan And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed.
The impugned charge sheet dated 02.05.2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 67/2024, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., pertaining to Police Station- Saadatganj, District- Lucknow and the impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 11.12.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, First Class/A.T.S., Lucknow in Criminal Case No. 118602/2024 including the entire consequential proceedings thereof are hereby quashed. 9. Office is directed to communicate this order to learned trial Court, forthwith. November 11, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 9266 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench