Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173933 (ALL)

AVINASH YADAV v. THE STATE OF UP THRU. SECY. DEPTT. HOME and ORS.

A482/5222/2017 · 2025-10-30

Rajeev Bharti

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5222 of 2017 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. Ms. Shreya Ojha, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Pushpila Bisht learned counsel for the applicant states that by efflux of time, the matter has rendered infructous. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to it. In view of the statement made on behalf of learned counsel for the applicant, the case is dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. October 30, 2025 Shukla Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pushpila Bhist Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Avinash Yadav .....Applicant(s) The State Of Up Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home And Ors. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench