MANICHANDRA CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/11884/2025 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11884 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.260 of 2024 under sections 65(1) BNS and under section 5L/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Nasirabad, District Rae Bareli.
3. It is argued that the applicant was enlarged on bail vide order dated
09.10.2025. Subsequently, the charges were altered. The applicant has not misused the bail, as such, the applicant is also entitled for the bail in the newly altered charges also.
4. The sureties furnished earlier shall be the valid surety in the present section also.
5. The bail application is allowed.
November 28, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi, Kajol Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Manichandra Chauhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench