Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17393 (UTT)

SMT. NIRMAL KAUR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1755/2015 · 2025-12-10

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

` SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.1755 of 2015 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Sudhir Nailwal, S.C. for the State. 3. There is no representation for respondent no.4. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that he has got no instructions in the matter. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 10.12.2025 SK