DURGESH KUMAR MAURYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF NYAY LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/9879/2025 · 2025-11-17
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173920 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173920 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9879 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pankaj Khare, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.4.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the interview results have already been declared and the persons, who have been appointed, have already started working.
3. In light of the same, no cause of action remains in this writ petition.
4. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, if any fresh cause of action arises. November 17, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Utkarsh Misra, Abhishek Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shikhar Anand (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Durgesh Kumar Maurya And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Nyay Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench