Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173908 (MAD)

Selvi v. The Block Development Officer

WP(MD)/34910/2025 · 2025-12-02

G Jayachandran, K K Ramakrishnan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.34910 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.12.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN W.P.(MD)No.34910 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.27608 and 27610 of 2025 Selvi ... Petitioner Vs. The Block Development Officer, Thulaiyanur Union, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondent PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the impugned notice issued by the respondent proceedings in Na.Ka.A2/913/2025 dated 06.11.2025 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Dhinakar For Respondent : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.34910 of 2025 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.) The petitioner, who is the holder of patta in Survey No.906/5 in Malaikudipatti Village, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukottai District, is before this Court stating that the eviction notice issued by the Block Development Officer dated 06.11.2025 to evict him from Survey No. 906/5 is not legally sustainable on the ground that the competent authority to issue eviction is only the Tahilsdar and not the Block Development Officer. That apart the appellant claims that he holds patta for the subject land and he cannot be termed as encroacher. 2.The learned Additional Government Pleader submits that the petitioner holds patta in respect of the property in Survey No.907/2, whereas Survey No.906/5 is classified as Arasu Poromboke lake and they are occupying the Government poromboke land illegally. Hence, notice under Section 131 (2) of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act was issued by the Block Development Officer requesting them to vacate the encroached portion, if they fail to do so, then necessary action will be taken for eviction by the Tahsildar under Section 7 of the Land Encroachment Act. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.34910 of 2025 3.Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [G.J., J.] & [K.K.R.K., J.] 02.12.2025 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes ta To The Block Development Officer, Thulaiyanur Union, Pudukkottai District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.34910 of 2025 DR. G. JAYACHANDRAN , J. AND K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J. ta W.P.(MD)No.34910 of 2025 02.12.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis