KAILASH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/948/2025 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173895 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173895 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 948 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of the informant despite service of notice.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 438 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No. 529 of 2023, under Sections 452, 354, 323, 376, 377, 506 IPC & Section 3(2)(v), 3(2)(va) S.C./S.T. Act, PS Motipur, District Bahraich.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was granted benefit of interim anticipatory bail on 2.9.2025. As is evident from record there is no material to suggest that the applicant has misused the liberty granted by this Court.
4. In view thereof the anticipatory bail granted to the applicant is extended till the conclusion of trail subject to his furnishing sureties to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned.
5. The application is disposed of. October 29, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Kailash Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench