DR. MADAN LAL BENIWAL S/O CHHITARMAL JAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/7189/2025 · 2025-05-13
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Mukesh Rajpurohit
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17389 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17389 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:20063-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7189/2025 Dr. Madan Lal Beniwal S/o Chhitarmal Jat, aged about 59 years, R/o Nimodiya Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Ayurveda (Ayush) Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. State of Rajasthan, through Principal Secretary, Department of Ayurveda and Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush), Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Dy. Secretary, Department of Ayurveda and Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush), Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. State of Rajasthan, through Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. Director Ayurveda, Directorate of Ayurveda, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Samee Khan Advocate and Ms. Sunita Meena Advocate on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma Additional Advocate General.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order 13/05/2025
1. Mr. Samee Khan, associate of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, on advance copy, enters appearance on behalf of the respondents.
2. After the order was passed by this Court earlier on 20.09.2024 in another petition, new developments have been
[2025:RJ-JP:20063-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-7189/2025] brought to the notice of this Court, one of them regarding dismissal of the Review Petition by the Hon’ble Supreme Court filed in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma on 15.10.2024 as stated at the bar by learned counsel for the petitioner.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed before this Court order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Pyare Lal Meena & Ors. (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10560/2024), wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has clarified that there is no stay on the judgment of the High Court and further that in the event the outstanding towards salary has not been paid, the same shall be cleared within a period of one week. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner will retire from service on 31.05.2025.
4. In view of the above developments, we need not keep this petition pending and same is also finally disposed off in terms of
order passed earlier by this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected matters (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13496/2021), decided on 13.07.2022. The petitioner will be entitled to the same relief as was granted in the aforesaid cases meaning thereby, the petitioner is entitled to continue in service with all consequential benefits including monetary benefits upto the age of 62 years.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ MANOJ NARWANI-GARIMA/23.